Fabricated laws being brought against Boatner on Conlee's behalf by the county attorney
County attorney advised me that he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County Iowa then carries on to file frivolous complaints based on fabricated laws against me.
The Expansion or Enlargement of Nonconforming Uses. Most
zoning ordinances provide that nonconforming uses may continue in their present form and
scope, but that they will not be allowed to expand. Eveline Twp v H & D Trucking, above.
Alternatively, some ordinances provide that expansion is permitted in a limited fashion but
only after a specific zoning approval has been obtained from the municipality.
In my mind is a not questionable. Why am I mistaken in my conclusion? Include references please as the local law enforcement have been far less that honest in anyway in their involvement.
An unprecedented case of public corruption committed by my local government officials
The County Attorney has the duty to prosecute all criminal offenses in his County. Mike Short advised me he would decide who get prosecuted in Lee County. I get summoned to court because "Mark Conlee said I gave him the finger." I don't do chemicals and if I did, I believe it would be my decision what chemical I would be exposed to. Not Lee County or the City of Montrose officials.
Statute of Limitations - Tolling The Statute Source: Statute of Limitations - Tolling The Statute - Time, Action, Tolled, and Debt - JRank Articles
The passage of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law No: 103-322) enabled the federal government to take action to remedy any pattern or practice of conduct by state and local law enforcement agencies “that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.”
Source: 18 U.S. Code § 245 - Federally protected activities | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Source: 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Source: 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Source: 18 U.S. Code Chapter 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Because the city building official refused to address my concerns in regard to the city's nuisance drainage ordinance, I telephoned the State Rep. Philip Wise. Mr Wise called city hall on my behalf and asked that I be put on the council meeting agenda so I could directly question Mark Holland appointed building official. With the agenda being public it is my opinion Holland was absent from that meeting for the purpose of avoiding my questions. Phil Wise did not hesitate to use his political influence as a professional courtesy to his constituent. He retired soon after this began. I have contacted now State Representative Jerry Kearns to speak with him about this ongoing situation. He refuses to speak to me about this subject. He has shown no professional courtesy that Phil Wise did. I resent Jerry Kearns for his disregard of my attack. What reason does he have to pretend that this hasn't happened on his watch? Does he have a conflict of interest? If he does he should acknowledge that to be a fact, not ignore my questions or disregard the serious criminal offenses committed by the local authorities. He represents the people, he should report any unethical behavior of the local government to the proper authorities.
Well I cannot sleep, my family member was so overcome with enjoyment they could not contain the pleasure they were feeling on Monday evening, so pleased with them self that they had such an influence in convincing people from my hometown that I was "crazy" during the darkest days of my life when I was suffering from the severe skin condition and blindness that resulted from the neighbor using the chemicals to eliminate me from my property.
Existing Conflicts of Interest between the individual local government officials. Named as a relevant issue for warranting a public corruption investigation by the FBI.
Did you know that occupying on private land protected by Property rights is considered a trespass? The law will find you guilty and can send you away for a couple of months or pay some hefty fee you’ll probably regret. So to avoid such a debacle, here are some facts about property rights and trespassing … Continue reading Unlawful application of chemicals to my property with intent to cause serious injury.