Neighbor used toxic chemical to eliminate me from my property so he could get his new illegal property redevelopment recorded on the county plat map.
Category: Mark Conlee
physically attacked me and my property causing severe damages. Use his position as Council member to try to get me back. He failed in that mission. Textbook psychopathic traits he only became more aggressive.
After being told by Mayor Dinwiddie that this was a private issue I went to City Hall. I got copies of the building permits on file for Mark Conlees new garage and his new home. This one for his new home.
warning to City of Montrose unlawful application of toxic chemicals
3-24-2007 EPA warning City of Montrose illegal applied chemicals that directly feed into the Mississippi River.
This is the warning the EPA sent to the City. It states the process that the City failed to do in order to lawfully spray chemicals. If these chemicals were not harmful to humans, why would these laws be needed? The City is required to have a certified applicator, which they did not. This was done soon after Mark Conlee (suspiciously) took his elected seat as a council member. There has never been any chemicals sprayed on my property by anyone until Mark Conlee took the unlawful liberty to trespass on my property with toxic chemicals. After the City received this warning Mark Conlee continued to apply chemicals to my property as part of his yard maintenance routine, he went back to his original plan of only applying it to my property along our common boundary line. An investigation would expose that it was not the Street Dept, director Craig Junkins who actually applied the chemicals in the point source of the drainage ditch that flows to the backwater slough and into the Mississippi River. The chemicals were to precisely applied. Clearly only where the City easement is on my property, not any on Mr. Conlee’s easement. Mr Junkins would not have been so meticulous, he would have applied it the entire length of the Cities easement. Mr Conlee was obsessed with finding me guilty of violating a City ordinance. This act was another attempt to cite me for nuisance weeds. He personally came home from work during his lunch hour, (he never comes home for lunch) he personally drove directly to the area in the City’s drainage ditch and took photographs of the weeds on my side of the gully as well as the weeds on the Cities side of the gully. The photos only proved to be evidence that illegal chemicals had been directly applied to the headwaters of Jack Creek, these chemicals killed all living plants on my property but washed downstream through the City culvert and across the properties of the 2 downstream neighbors. It killed all living plants and probably animals on their properties also. It was the neighbor whose property was the farthest downstream who called and reported the incident to the EPA. The letter is addressed to Mr. Junkins only because he was the head of the street dept. at this time. Mr. Conlee being a City council member has no authority to do anything on behalf of the City except attend council meetings and vote. The Cities insurance does not cover him to be acting as an employee of the street dept. By this time due to the prior year of Mr Conlee illegally applying toxic chemicals to my property I had developed a skin condition so severe that it was unbearable to wear cloths, I was wearing my bathrobe when the field investigator came to the location and took soil samples and a written statement from the 2 other neighbors whose property was effected and myself. · Updated 4 minutes ago
former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano sought to carve out a distinction.
“To our belief, (Stack) was a lone wolf,” she said. “He used a terrorist tactic, but an individual who uses a terrorist tactic doesn’t necessarily mean they are part of an organized group attempting an attack on the United States.”
Napolitano’s description mapped out, if tortuously, a clear difference. But it also reinvented the word. By her given logic, a single individual without material support from others could not — by definition — carry out a terror attack.
I hired Steve Swan to sue the City of Montrose in July 2005. This is not typical for a neighbor to have to do, the building authority has the duty to address residents concerns regarding nuisance drainage issues caused by new property redevelopment. He sent this letter to Conlee that afternoon. He lied by continuing to claim he filed a complaint against the City of Montrose. He stated that we would sue both parties, the City is where the money is at. Based on the fact that the building permits are illegal, the redevelopment of the legally non conforming property is illegal I knew full well who the liable party was. So what does his failure to represent my best interests fall in the justice system. An investigation would be required to find that evidence. The evidence supports the least of his immoral, unethical behavior is legal malpractice. This could be due to his physical disabilities, This man is morbidly obese. For him to actually get to the courthouse to file a complaint on behalf of a client has to be extremely difficult for him. He had to set on four chairs in the courtroom. I filed a complaint but of course the sided with Swan, We agreed to barter services for this case, after which he sent me a bill for $4000.00. I never was billed after I filed the complaint. Is it not the his responsibility to present evidence and question witnesses? He never did that either. I believe the evidence supports his actions are within that of a co-conspirator.
Boatner followed standard procedure provided for all citizens to remedy issues caused by a neighbor’s property redevelopment. This property is legally nonconforming. The new neighbor purchased the lot from the Mayor of the City. City building official Mark Holland admitted he did not intend to do his duty and follow standard procedures to address and remedy the situation. Boatner contacted State Representative Phil Wise. Having explained the situation to Mr. Wise he showed the professional courtesy to contact City Hall and have Boatner put on the agenda so she could direct her questions to Council member/Building official Mark Holland in regards to the building permits issued for Mark Conlees property redevelopment. Having Contacted the Mayor and city clerk previously, she was always told to contact the building official. Again she was denied the opportunity to point out the fact that Conlee’s property is a legally nonconforming property and Iowa building code restricts the size of structures to be no large that the existing structures and they must comply with current building codes. These nonconforming structures are much larger that the existing double-wide mobile home and single car garage. Having reviewed the blueprints and following standard procedure Mark Holland would have never legally been able to issue building permits for these nonconforming structures. Holland was absent from this meeting. Based on the record of attendance at these meetings one may consider his absence was intentional. He was aware that Boatner was on the agenda for the purpose of getting answers to her questions concerning how these illegal redevelopment were approved, and the foreseeable nuisance drainage issue caused by the redevelopment had not been addressed and remedied.Conlee was unable to get the illegal redevelopment recorded on the County plat map. That is when he determined I was going to be eliminated. He had to have my property to get his illegal redevelopment recorded on the County plat map. He chose to use toxic chemicals to eliminate me. He applied chemicals to my property as if it were a normal part of his routine yard maintenance. My Federal 1st Amendment right was violated by the chief of police and the County attorney. I was literally begging County attorney Mike Short to protect my rights. I knew the chemicals were causing my death. Many people knew I was dying. They just did not care. They refused to file a trespassing complaint on my behalf. Their acts were blatant and intentional. State Representative Phil Wise retired soon after I contacted him. Since Jerry Kearns has been elected to State Rep. I have contacted him multiple times. He has made no comment. I want to know who he is representing. He is not representing me. He is not representing the State law. That only leave Mark Conlee’s best interest to be what he is representing.