NO ADVERSE IMPACT FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND THE COURTS

My initial complaint was in regard to this issue. To end up being poisoned by chemicals illegally applied to my property because the City and County officials had a conflict of interest with this illegally nonconforming owner/builder/redeveloper who was issued illegal building permits is unprecedented. It was the chemicals that nearly cost me my life. I could control the stormwater within my rights to defend my property. This man was angry that the officials could not control what I did legally on my own property. I could not control the chemicals, the fact that this man was allowed to do this knowing it was causing me physical harm and the officials dismissing the act as he had the right. That makes this a Federal Constitutional Rights case. The perps are the CIty and County officials who had the duty to protect my Right to enjoy my own property and my Right to Equal Protection of the Law.

via No adverse impact floodplain management and the courts

Before (Existing legally nonconforming property) and after (illegal nonconforming property redevelopment)

6-1-2002 Original Property Layout
Existing structures on legally non conforming property. Legally described as “half lots” Boatner owns those shown with numbers 1-6 that borders the city street. Mark Conlee purchased his from Mayor Dinwiddie shown here  adjoining Boatner’s property and bordering the city alley

 

 

4_7_2012 aerial shot after conlee redevelopment
The adverse effects to Boatner’s property were forseeable.  2005 there have been 4 illegal building permits issued to Mark Conlee by city building adminisrator Mark Holland. Two of them after Boatner followed standard proceedure and made a nuisance drainage complaint to buiding officials Holland. Holland refused his duty to address Boatner’s concerns but continued to conspire with Mark Conlee causing adverse effects to Boatner’s property