This guy takes the cake. Like if its not on this website it there must not be evidence, pretty assumptive of the AUSA for the Southern District of Iowa. Chemical warfare has nearly cost me my life and he thinks its a good idea to put all my evidence out here for the public to view, even the deranged people who used chemical warfare to eliminate me from my property. What is it that he is calling assumptive? All the evidence I have posted is hard copy original documents. If he cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that chemical weapons were used to eliminate me from my private property when even a civil court order or no law enforcement would stop him from applying chemicals to MY property, he should really find a new job. This case is cut and dry. Any reasonable person who would read the evidence I have posted has no doubt this was an intentional act. This evidence is based on facts, SA Reinwart wanted to used hearsay evidence, when the hard copy evidence is right in front of him. He wasted tax payer money to travel clear to the tip of Iowa to refuse to review hard copy evidence and ask for hearsay. When a person knows he is causing another person physical harm and doesn’t stop what he is doing to cause it, its pretty obvious why he is doing it. There is nothing that I have posted that does not have hard copy evidence to support. Reinwart did not follow procedure for investigation and you have not followed procedure for prosecuting criminals. VanderSchel you are assuming that reasonable people do not know it is illegal to do anything to another person property, not to mention unheard of act of chemical warfare as stated by the EPA field investigator. That is a F(&99+ fact. And I have to mention that you advised me that you would not be the person prosecuting this case anyway so why do you think you have any input about this case at all? You are assuming you have some kind of authority over a case that you are not the prosecutor of. That show a defect in your personality any reasonable person can determine that to be a fact also. An attorney of minimum experience could win this case. The evidence is solid as a rock. Not the hearsay, the hard copy evidence. Hearsay does not stand up in court, don’t you know that?
Here is an example of how well FBI SA and the AUSA reviewed my evidence. In this letter the AUSA claims that most of the activity occurred 2003-2005. It is well documented that 2003-2005 is when the City allowed for the non compliant to State building code structures built on Mark Conlee’s nonconforming lot to be built. If they would have actually reviewed my evidence, instead of asking that I tell them this complex story they would have discovered the chemical warfare started in 2005-2010, during that time I was unable to get any protection of the law, there was a civil trial that the court ruled in my favor, however Conlee would not comply with that court order and the chemical attack continued on a weekly basis. There is nothing in this letter that is based on the facts the evidence supports. VanderSchel has advised that he has reviewed my website. He could not have mistaken the timeline if he actually had reviewed it. VanderSchel the chemical poisoning began in 2005. Are you being intentionally negligent? I also advised you that when I was forced to flee from my property because I could get no law enforcement to stop this man from applying the toxic chemicals to my property, the full body skin condition was so severe it was unbearable to wear clothes, I was blind, and I was homeless for the following 4 years. So that takes us up to 2014 before I was able to make contact with anyone who has the duty to protect my Constitutional Rights. SA Reinwart does not know that private property rights are Federally protected rights. He does not seem to know about any Federal laws except hate crimes. He did not review my evidence, He did not interview any of my witnesses, he did not interview my Drs., he did not interview the perps or he could have easily charged them with lying to the Feds. You tell me Mr. VanderSchel just what did SA Reinwart do to investigate my allegation. You claim that the statute of limitations had expired between 2013 and 2016, am I responsible to make Reinwart investigate in a timely fashion? I couldn’t even get him to review the hard copy evidence which was the purpose for him to come to my home 16 months after I contacted him. I had previously contacted a female agent from the Hiawatha division and was waiting some time for her to respond as she advised she would, finally I telephoned the number I had previously contacted her with, Reinwart answered and advise that she had been transferred. Is it my responsibility to call and check if an agent has been transferred? I have not read that as a standard procedure for complainants. Not to mention my emails to the Omaha division, and telephone calls to the Washington DC headquarters. I have gone above and beyond reasonable efforts to contact an FBI agent. Senator Grassley advised me in 2009 that an agent would be contacting me. I waited 10 years then I got impatient. Its not as if I have physically recovered from the chemicals illegally applied to my property without any protection of the law and my private property rights for those significant 5 long years.
I was speaking with the AUSA. He seemed quite sarcastic in all his statements. One statement in particular I really question. I asked him if you had the authority not to honor the ruling made in the civil court trial. He advised that he could completely ignore that order. I think in order for anyone to violate a court order they would have to appeal that decision. Who can answer that question? If that were the case why even bother with a civil court trial? I think the AUSA is full of himself and lying more often that he has told me the truth. Then he advised me that he would not be the prosecutor if I could ever get a prosecutor to file a complaint on my behalf. My question to that is why is he even involving himself in this case when he has no authority to prosecute? He wouldn’t give me the contact info for the correct prosecutor, not that the correct prosecutor has not been completely convinced of the lies that this sarcastic prosecutor has been willing to accept as fact. Who do these people think they are that they can violate my Federally protected rights any more that the locals already have. Terrorist acts using chemical weapons is a serious criminal offense. I think they have to prosecute crimes that are this serious. Crimes that chemical weapons have been used for force me from my property? According to the incompetent FBI agent is not a violation of Federal law. Where did he get his education?
If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”—Thomas Jefferson We are approaching critical mass, the point at which all hell breaks loose. The government is pushing us ever closer to a constitutional crisis. What makes the outlook so much bleaker […]
Our local media publisher Chuck Vanderburg has been following my story since the beginning. I don’t know exactly what set him off, but he has blocked me from sending him emails. Interesting. He seemed to always have a high opinion of our County Sheriff. So if he should happen to lurk on my site here is what I want him to know.
I don’t know how long I have been blocked. I rarely even want to comment on any of your stuff. But once in a while I see something that is so conflicting with what I have experienced I have to comment. Not that you will publish it, but so you will personally know the facts and my feeling about something you are publishing. I feel sorry for you. You do not feel that individual rights are as important if not more important than your relationship with Sheriff Weber, He has proven criminal behavior of being a low life scoundrel matching the character of the rest of his group of organized self serving imposters. How these people can so easily put on such a phoney mask to the reality of what they are achieving behind the backs of unsuspecting citizens is unreal. It is a learned behavior. I am naive. You had me fooled. Weber’s commitment to the Conlee’s is a much higher degree than his representation of the written law. IMO as a media representative you have an ethical duty to the citizens to be truthful and expose wrongdoers. You have the tool to help society in general but do not utilize it for the good of the people. But you have made the decision to oppress the story and in effect have contributed a large amount of the brutality that has been committed against me as a human being. Shame on you for playing with my life by not publishing the evidence that you know full well is completely based on facts. Whatever Chuck, one day everything will be public. Never give up your 1st Amendment rights under pressure of retaliation.
All my best,
I just wanted to let you know that I have been out of town most of this past week. I actually had dermatology appointment for Thursday but…………. it did not go as planned, typical of my life. Nothing goes as planned. I had determined I would not make plans to avoid having plans not turn out. But given the situation, and knowing that I would have to make planned Dr. appointments. I had to throw the not make plans idea out with the trash. I will not go into details but, my appt was set for early Thursday morning. I did make room reservations to stay overnight on Wed. Given the situation with the not normal frigid temperatures I did not want to be driving pre-dawn with the temperatures hitting the 20- below 0 mark. Well of course when I left to drive the few miles to the appointment, wouldn’t you know my car would not start. Not unusual given the circumstances, many people discovered that their generally dependable vehicles would not start. So I called the Dr and told them I would be late, I did not know how late, but would call them when I got my car started. It would not start at all on Thursday. I had no option but to stay at the hotel another day. $$$$ the piddly amount of benefits I get for disability is a little over $700 p/mo I pretty much have my financial situation set in stone, I have no extra money for hotels and such extravagant luxuries. Two nights in a hotel simply is not affordable on disability. Finally about noon today a couple fellows helped jump start my battery. I made it back home but in part the reason my car would not start was because one of the battery terminals was cracked at an angle completely through it. It would not tighten. I did not notice until I got home this afternoon. I had noticed it would become loose and I would just twist it a little with my hand and it would make contact enough to start. So this evening I replaced the battery terminal, more unexpected $$$$. But I am alive. I do exist.
LIKE MY PAGE SHARE MY PAGE
CHEMICAL WARFARE IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY
Well this may be against my best interest but at this point what do I have to lose. I am publishing the email of the FBI SA who refused to review my hard copy evidence. Did not look into the financial record of the accused to see if perhaps a bribe has been paid. He accepted hearsay to be evidence. My case did not even get issued a case number. He did not recognize that private property rights are Federally protected rights. He continued to claim that no Federal law has been broken when anyone who has taken the time to review the evidence agrees with me that Federal laws have been violated on more than one occasion. firstname.lastname@example.org. He goes by the first name of Thomas.
The AUSA immediately advised me that he would not prosecute giving me three different reasons at three different times. The first three reasons I submitted evidence that he was incorrect as to what the evidence proved he was basing his decision on. Knowing he has been given false information or information based on hearsay by the above named FBI agent. The most recent decision not to prosecute was because he has the authority. I sent him guidelines suggested by the Attorney General but to no avail. The letter states that I am not supposed to contact this AUSA again. They will not put any more resources into my insignificant case. I explained that a civil court order early on in my favor was violated by the local government officials and he callously does not care. Kevin.VanderSchel@doj.gov. he of course goes by the name of Kevin.
There is no record of any citizen being forced to flee from their private property due to unlawful application of toxic chemicals being applied, ongoing for over 5 years. NONE. It seems to me that anyone who would continue an act that he knows is causing anyone else physical harm has some mental health issues. I know I would not do anything to anyone else’s property because it is illegal and immoral. It seems the Federal authorities feel that they can join in this figurative gang rape. I feel they need to be held accountable as well as the locals. There is nothing I have posted that is based on hearsay or based on fabricated information. There is much evidence that I have not posted. If these individuals are satisfied that they have upheld their duty and the oath they took to uphold the Constitution of the United States then they should be proud of their job performance in my unnumbered case. They never showed any real intent to defend my rights given by Federal law. They should be proud of their actions in this case that has multiple violations of Federal law. Anyone who reads my information and feels my Federally protected rights have been violated I urge you to email these individuals and let them know that private property rights are Federally protected rights and any other opinions you may have that Federal law has in fact been violated. Terrorism is not a violation of Federal law I have been told. Only supporters of terrorism are violating Federal law, so clearly the local officials who would not stop this neighbor from applying the chemicals to my property are supporters of terrorism. Yes herbicides and pesticides are considered chemical weapons. I have done all the research to know that violations of Federal law have occured.
If something happens to me it is well documented as to who may be involved. Just saying. Glyphosate is harmful to human beings when not applied as directed on the label. This is what is wrong with our Government today. Covering up and supporting corruption is not what the FBI has the duty to do. I want to know why I am exempt from the same rights that every other citizen takes for granted, as I did when I fled from my home, business and property. There is no justifiable reason any US citizen should have to suffer what I have suffered.
Investigations by the FBI are premised upon the fundamental duty of government to protect the public against general crimes, against organized criminal activity, and against those who would threaten the fabric of our society through terrorism or mass destruction. That duty must be performed with care to protect individual rights and to insure that investigations are confined to matters of legitimate law enforcement interest. The purpose of these Guidelines, therefore, is to establish a consistent policy in such matters. The Guidelines will enable Agents of the FBI to perform their duties with greater certainty, confidence and effectiveness, and will provide the American people with a firm assurance that the FBI is acting properly under the law.
What’s the deal here? Are there any areas within the USA that are excluded? Because the SA that investigated my case did not follow anything about these guidelines, nor did he recognize that private property rights were Federally protected. Who doesn’t know that without having been trained to be an FBI agent?
I have gotten no answers. With every new contact I am left with even more questions. I want to know.
How did it take eleven years for my complaint to get from Senator Grassley to the AUSA.
How can this case even claim to have been investigated by the FBI, when the SA refused to review the hard copy evidence. My allegations of a conspiracy against rights would have to have financial records investigated to find if a bribe has been taken. That is what I told the SA. The FBI website states that the FBI works 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. That is false. I traveled to Cedar Rapids and arrived at 2:30 p.m. I telephone the FBI headquarters from the parking lot and advised him that I was there to speak with someone. (Determined that somebody was going to review my solid evidence) I was advised that it was to late in the day to speak with anyone. I advised the SA that I would get a room and be there first thing in the morning. SA advised me that it would not be possible to speak with anyone the following day due to it being a Federal holiday. It was Columbus Day. It took 16 months for this SA to clear his schedule enough to come to my home. He stayed 2 1/2 hours, checking his watch repeatedly. I assume he was attempting to make it back to headquarters by 5 p.m. So for anyone who really believes the FBI is an honorable agency holding a high priority to exposing public corruption you are completely misled.
The AUSA knows that the FBI investigator was incompetent. He knows the FBI SA gave him false information. He has determined to use attorney discretion for no reason, and certainly not within the suggested guidelines for doing so.
This gang rape by my local and Federal government officials is completely illegal, immoral and in violation of Federal law. The AUSA needs to find a new job supporting corrupt government officials and not falsely assume the position of duty that does cover this type of prosecution.
Neither the FBI SA or the AUSA is aware that private property rights are Federally protected rights. They are not qualified to hold their positions if they do not even know what the Federal law protects.
I want answers to these three questions. I want them now.
About the Author
My name is Melody Boatner. I was raised in Lee County, Iowa. In regards to my character, I hold a high regard to moral law. I do not lie, I do not cheat, and I do not steal. I have lived my life, as I was taught early on, by the golden rule, “Treat others as you want to be treated”. I have always been hard working, responsible, confident, talented, independent and trustworthy. All traits that seemingly are in the best interest of society as a whole.
I married, had a son and moved south for a few years. My son developed a serious, life threatening medical condition. Addicted to alcohol and drugs his father proved incapable of caring for him while I was at work. It was in his best interest that he and I move back home, to Iowa. In 1990 I called my brother. He drove to Georgia, rented a u-haul trailer and brought the two of us and all we could squeeze in the trailer back to Iowa. Three days later, I was hired by a local contractor as an assistant mechanic. I had to resign soon after because the employer provided no insurance benefits. Due to the rarity of my sons condition I was the only one, including the local doctors, familiar with the symptoms indicating his need for immediate medical attention. He was 6 years old when diagnosed and to maintain a normal quality of life he required monthly injections until he the age 18 years old or longer depending on his environment. At the time his condition was considered existing and he would have been excluded from any employer offer insurance benefit package. In order for me to care and provide for his future needs personally I needed to be self employed. Attorney Vivian Meyers got a divorce granted for me by the court pro-bono. I never received any of the court order child support. AFDC covered the cost of his medical needs. I have never receive any child support money from my ex-husband and never counted on anyone but myself to provide for my son.
I utilized the resources offered by the government for the poor to get out of poverty. I enrolled in a business course offered to low income families. S.E.I.D., To be successfully self-employed in a home based business I was taught how to prepare a business plan for to present to a financial lender. There was a demand for upholstery services in my area. October 9, 1991 I was selected to travel to Washington DC and testify to a Congressional Committee[. My intent was to explain to the committee that regulations at that time was preventing me from acquiring the tools I needed to start a business. Counting the value of assets (tools) for micro enterprise as a personal asset would exceed the income guidelines, exempting my son from being insured by Medicaid, that was not an option.
The fact that I was selected out of hundreds of individuals in the State of Iowa suggests that the program directors recognized my character to be determined to succeed in my goal. My glossophobia was so severe that my cheek was twitching and I barely uttered a sentence. The rules for value of business assets for self-employment were changed.
My brother financed my sewing machine and I made payments of $50 per/mo for 24 months. We agreed that I would set up shop in a portion of his garage. He owned the business named Brannon’s Upholstery. I worked as an employee, teaching myself how to upholster. I reinvested any personal income back into my future by purchasing tools, fabric and reference books. I paid the machine off as agreed.
My formal education in minimal. I dropped out of high school in the 11Th grade opting for a GED. I have never felt the need to prove a person to be of bad character to another person until now. I simply disassociate from anyone who treats me in a way that I do not want to be treated. I am self-educated in subjects that are interesting to me, I am self-educated to provide multiple skilled services such as my chosen career as an upholsterer. I have studied many personal interests, one of which is human behavior, particularly personality disorders. I am intelligent and have found employment based on the fact that I have good common sense I easily comprehend written material. I have an impressive personal library that includes a wide array of subjects.
My knowledge of the law specifically the duties and responsibilities a City has to provide in order to protect its residents was taught to me for the most part, by my father, whose career was a long time employee of a neighboring City of Ft Madison in Lee County, Ia. His job title was “acting Street Commissioner” prior to and during integration a new position of “City Engineer” who took over responsibility of issuing building permits to assure compliance to the “Iowa Stormwater drainage laws”. Smaller Cities such as the City of Montrose, Ia in which the Mayor appoints a council member to act as “building administrator” whose duties are to issue a building permit, review the blueprints, and charge a fee assessed by the value of completed re developments. Only after the administrator approves the completed project in compliance with State and Federal laws at which time he signs and approves the redevelopment is compliant to code issues a certificate of occupancy as described in the Building Code Officials Handbook and depending on if the location a manual provided by State Assoc of floodplain managers titled “NO ADVERSE IMPACT AND THE COURTS: PROTECTING THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF All” . Both manuals are available at Montrose City Hall. The local FEMA officer is Steve Cirinna, husband of City of Montrose clerk Celeste Cirinna.
February 1995 I made my brother angry. He demanded that we vacate the property immediately. Lee County Deputy Dave Hunold responded to my 9-9-1 call. My brother is a very large intimidating man. I have never seen him that angry before and never want to see him in that state of mind again. When we were kids I would make him mad and he would hit me , not uncommon for siblings. As adult sibling an intent to physically assault me is not, in my opinion, acceptable behavior. My son had never witnessed anyone acting violent and was terrified. Feb 22, 1995 I filed complaint to get possession my tools. The day before we were ordered to appear in court he notified me that I could retrieve my property. The case was dismissed and we had no interaction or contact until 2006 as will be explained later in this submission of evidence.
Homeless, we moved to into town, the city of Montrose, Ia and stayed with a friend. I rented a garage to work out of temporarily from Sue Kerns Dinwiddie prior to her marriage to Mayor Ron Dinwiddie. A friend had her property was for sale for a very affordable price. I went over and looked at it. It was structurally sound but in need of some serious maintenance. The house needed some of the seal plate and corner post replaced repair on the front right corner due to lack of maintenance by the City to the stormwater ditches. The garage was not too bad. I installed a furnace in both the house and the garage, I updated the electric service panel and rewired the house and garage. The workshop floor was completely replaced because stormwater ran directly into the entry door and the chairs that were at one time sitting on the shop floor had literally fell through the rotten plywood and were sitting on the ground of the crawlspace. I was within my price range at 10,000. The seller set the price so that she would be within the income guidelines to qualify for an apartment owner by the housing authority in Keokuk, Ia. The property lot was legally nonconforming with a long narrow lot running street to street. The typical conforming lot by the standards set in the 1980’s run from City street to City alley. There would be restrictions if I ever needed to build a new structure but this property potentially had everything needed to provide a home for my son and a garage to operate my business.
When I first moved in with my friend I applied for a Habitat for Humanity house. We were selected to receive the next habitat built home. A few days later I was notified by the bank that I had been approved for the loan for the $10,000 fixer upper that my friend was selling. There were many other bonuses this property provided for me from day one, life, liberty, and enjoyment of my property. This property was perfect for me. I withdrew my application from Habitat for Humanity
Nov. 1995 We moved into the house at 111 N 5Th St, Montrose, Ia . Typical to the early 1900’s era, Boatner’s property was protected from stormwater runoff by using the berm and swale technique along the common boundary of the adjoining property at 105 N 5Th St. The berm was distinct in its purpose. When it rained the stormwater was held back and actually formed a pond on the right side as it was designed to do.
2 I can not stress enough that the damage to the existing structures on my property was caused by stormwater runoff from 5Th St. The City of Montrose had not maintained any of storm water drainage ditches for so long that in most cases and certainly in front of my property on 5Th St there were no visible evidence that a ditch ever existed. Both corners of my lot contained very nice and culverts. I know full well that it is the City’s responsibilities to maintain the streets and drainage ditches. I did not complain to the City that they had been negligent in maintaining the ditches. I was well aware that they are liable for the ditch maintenance. I had the ability to do it myself.
My first priority was to hand dig the ditches and replace the driveway culvert. There are many witnesses to that fact, including Police chief at the time Officer John Farmer. Most all the properties in town suffered adverse effects from stormwater due to the City’s failure to maintain. Stormwater ran from the street down the driveway into the doorway of my garage, the floor had rotted through and chairs had fallen through. Storm water ran over the sidewalk to the front corner of my house. I guess it must have been ongoing for 10 or 15 years. It didn’t take to long for me repair the cause of the damage to structures on my property. I already had the knowledge of how to do the repairs. I had access to any equipment I needed. My friends are in the field of construction.
I renovated, rehabilitated and upgraded most everything by the time it the loan was satisfied. I have receipts to prove the amount of money I reinvested into the property.. I paid the loan off in 2000.
I had established a reputable upholstery service and raised my son though his school years in the house at 111 N 5Th St Montrose, Ia. My son has always worked, starting as a paperboy when we moved to this house. He graduated high school and though he has had some health problems, he no longer requires monthly injections. He has worked for Huffman Welding and Machine since he graduated, he is now 32 years old. I never had any problems with neighbors of any kind. We all got along, everyone was friendly, and considered it a nice neighborhood to live in.
Ron Dinwiddie has been the Mayor of the City of Montrose since 1995 when I purchased my property. There has not been much turnover in council members and City employees. I have never been involved with the City politics or attended the City Council meetings. It was my opinion that all seemed to be running well within the City Government. Those who were in charge seemed sincere in their roles as community leaders.
You will be led to believe that I am a lazy person who never takes care of her financial responsibilities. That is simply not true. I downloaded this when I knew my credit was being damaged due to unexpected ER visits when the chemicals began to cause severe pain. Before the first bill got sent to collections my score was 760.
A Chemical Weapon is a chemical used to cause intentional death or harm through its toxic properties. Munitions, devices and other equipment specifically designed to weaponize toxic chemicals also fall under the definition of chemical weapons.
The prohibition of the use of herbicides as a method of warfare is recognised in the CWC Preamble. However, herbicides are not defined specifically in the Convention.
Herbicides that are intentionally used to harm humans or animals through chemical action on life processes could be considered a chemical weapon under the general purpose criteria.”
I have never claimed my damages occurred in 2003-2005, that is when the illegal property redevelopment was going on. My allegations of conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law began in 2005 with the most recent occurring in April 2017. If anyone actually felt they had a duty to actually read my complaint there would be no mistaking of timelines. But in this case we rely on what someone who was not interested in the first place tell their version of the story to a third party. That is hearsay, which is not evidence that is allowed in court or in any reasonable investigation. Mr. VanderSchel, how about I send a copy of my complaint directly to you. You read the entire complaint and then you may be more able to base a decision on what the complaint states. Your information is incorrect. I should not have to continue to beg for justice based on people being misinformed as to that the evidence supports.
I contacted Senator Grassley in 2007, he forwarded my information to the FBI. Are you telling me it has taken 11 years for my case to get from the Senator to the hands of the US attorney and the information is not based on the information in the written complaint I submitted to the local FBI agent. This local agent told me 3 different versions of what would happen after I submitted my complaint to him. I do not have any evidence that he even submitted my written complaint. I have evidence that the most recent act of conspiracy happened in April 2017 well within the statute of limitations. I have not been negligent in anyway of not submitting timely complaints. How in the hell does it take 11 years for a complaint to get from a Senator to a US Attorney.
Somebody has some splanin to do. Where is the written complaint I submitted to the local FBI?
652. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CONSPIRACY
Conspiracy is a continuing offense. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).
An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).
|songboat <email@example.com>||Aug 19, 2018, 12:33 AM|
You have never looked into the financial records of Conlee and the County Attorney or my attorney or any of the rest of this criminal enterprise, have you? I told you that Mark Conlee’s personality disorder would not allow for him not to keep a record of who he payed off. It the linked case is Federal then why would my case be exempt? My case also falls into the guidelines of violation of international human rights crimes I have been told.So I would think there would be many allegations like mine. If there is no Federal law to hold City and Countys accountable for using chemicals to force you from your property and they happen to have a conflict of interest with the local officials, but the local officials instead of recognizing the conflict, they use the situation for personal gain. Hey, I read about conflict of interest on the FBI website. Why is my case not within the guidelines for Federal conspiracy against rights and deprivation of rights under color of law? By rights I mean my rights given by Amendments 4, 7,8, 14
The FBI is the primary federal agencyresponsible for investigating allegations regarding violations of federal civil rights statutes. These laws are designed to protect the civil rights of all persons—citizens and non-citizens alike—within U.S. territory. Using its full suite of investigative and intelligence capabilities, the Bureau today works closely with its partners to prevent and address hate crime, human trafficking, color of law violations, and Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act violations
Color of Law Violations Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” to willfully deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.
The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law violations, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way. Those violations include the following acts:
Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is “reasonably” necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully “unreasonable” or “excessive.” chemical weapons would fall under this catagory
False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person’s civil rights may occur. Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority. This happened multiple times in my case, This is the most personally offensive action against me in my opinion.
Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute. This one is a given. Did you look at the affects the chemicals had on my skin? The scars that I will carry with me on my arms the rest of my life. Nobody protected me from harm. You have the evidence that proves this without a doubt.
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a pattern and practice investigation include:
- Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers’ actions; City of Montrose and Lee County Ia
- Lack of justification or reporting by officers on incidents involving the use of force; Lee County Sheriff’s Dept. and City of Montrose Police Dept.
- Lack of, or improper training of, officers; and Lee County Sheriffs Dept. and City of Montrose Police Dept
- Citizen complaint processes that treat complainants as adversaries. City of Montrose, Lee County sheriff dept, State of Iowa prosecuting attorney for Lee County
ADDRESSING POLICE MISCONDUCT LAWS ENFORCED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal laws that address police misconduct include both criminal and civil statutes. These laws cover the actions of State, county, and local officers, including those who work in prisons and jails. In addition, several laws also apply to Federal law enforcement officers. The laws protect all persons in the United States (citizens and non-citizens).
It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). “Color of law” simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts “under color of law” even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. The types of law enforcement misconduct covered by these laws include excessive force, sexual assault, intentional false arrests, or the intentional fabrication of evidence resulting in a loss of liberty to another. Enforcement of these provisions does not require that any racial, religious, or other discriminatory motive existed. What remedies are available under these laws? Violations of these laws are punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. There is no private right of action under these statutes; in other words, these are not the legal provisions under which you would file a lawsuit on your own.
Federal Civil Enforcement
“Police Misconduct Provision”
This law makes it unlawful for State or local law enforcement officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (42 U.S.C. § 14141). The types of conduct covered by this law can include, among other things, excessive force, discriminatory harassment, false arrests, coercive sexual conduct, and unlawful stops, searches or arrests. In order to be covered by this law, the misconduct must constitute a “pattern or practice” — it may not simply be an isolated incident. The DOJ must be able to show in court that the agency has an unlawful policy or that the incidents constituted a pattern of unlawful conduct. However, unlike the other civil laws discussed below, DOJ does not have to show that discrimination has occurred in order to prove a pattern or practice of misconduct. What remedies are available under this law? The remedies available under this law do not provide for individual monetary relief for the victims of the misconduct. Rather, they provide for injunctive relief, such as orders to end the misconduct and changes in the agency’s policies and procedures that resulted in or allowed the misconduct. There is no private right of action under this law; only DOJ may file suit for violations of the Police Misconduct Provision.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
and the “OJP Program Statute”
Together, these laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, and religion by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance from the Department of Justice. (42 U.S.C. § 2000d, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)). Currently, most persons are served by a law enforcement agency that receives DOJ funds. These laws prohibit both individual instances and patterns or practices of discriminatory misconduct, i.e., treating a person differently because of race, color, national origin, sex, or religion. The misconduct covered by Title VI and the OJP (Office of Justice Programs) Program Statute includes, for example, harassment or use of racial slurs, unjustified arrests, discriminatory traffic stops, coercive sexual conduct, retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or participating in the investigation, use of excessive force, or refusal by the agency to respond to complaints alleging discriminatory treatment by its officers. What remedies are available under these laws?DOJ may seek changes in the policies and procedures of the agency to remedy violations of these laws and, if appropriate, also seek individual remedial relief for the victim(s). Individuals also have a private right of action under Title VI and under the OJP Program Statute; in other words, you may file a lawsuit yourself under these laws. However, you must first exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ if you wish to file in Federal Court under the OJP Program Statute.
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability. (42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq. and 29 U.S.C. § 794). These laws protect all people with disabilities in the United States. An individual is considered to have a “disability” if he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.
The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all State and local government programs, services, and activities regardless of whether they receive DOJ financial assistance; it also protects people who are discriminated against because of their association with a person with a disability. Section 504 prohibits discrimination by State and local law enforcement agencies that receive financial assistance from DOJ. Section 504 also prohibits discrimination in programs and activities conducted by Federal agencies, including law enforcement agencies.
These laws prohibit discriminatory treatment, including misconduct, on the basis of disability in virtually all law enforcement services and activities. These activities include, among others, interrogating witnesses, providing emergency services, enforcing laws, addressing citizen complaints, and arresting, booking, and holding suspects. These laws also prohibit retaliation for filing a complaint with DOJ or participating in the investigation. What remedies are available under these laws? If appropriate, DOJ may seek individual relief for the victim(s), in addition to changes in the policies and procedures of the law enforcement agency. Individuals have a private right of action under both the ADA and Section 504; you may file a private lawsuit for violations of these statutes. There is no requirement that you exhaust your administrative remedies by filing a complaint with DOJ first. It was the misconduct of these officers that causes my disability.
It seems it would be appropriate to bring a complaint in violation of fair housing act, I would need to speak with the US Attorney about this issue;
I have also been advised this case is one of environmental protection violations. This case has some elements of all Federal law violations. If you have read this reply “ok”
It took eleven years for my case to get from Senator Grassley to the AUSA. Of course the AUSA assumes many things, such as he is sure Senator Grassley has not submitted all my evidence to the FBI. I have a personal confirmation that it was Senator Grassley’s intent to forward all the evidence I submitted to him to the FBI. So somebody dropped the ball, it was not me and it was not the AUSA. The neighbor has committed perjury, right out lied to city council members, and the number of lies he has told I can prove are significant enough that any reasonable man could determine he is not credible. Of course he has connections with the local law enforcement and government officials and I mean close conflict of interest connections. This neighbors brother is a former detective for Lee County Sheriff’s dept. He has the same character traits as the neighbor, he told lies about me early on and I can prove that. The former detective was the biggest liar I had ever known until I met his brother, my neighbor. Perhaps genetic? For one of these reasons this neighbor was held above the law at all times. Either they are afraid of the repercussion that they will face if they do not support every illegal action he has committed or he has such a severe psychopathic personality that he has easily manipulated and convinced others that the lies he tells are true. I know that there is not one person locally who can claim they have ever caught me in a lie about anything. Reading my evidence it is easily determined who has conspired with this neighbor to violate my Federally protected rights. I must stress to have the ability to recognize false statements requires actual READING the documented evidence.
You know full well that there are laws that protect citizens from aggressive neighbors. There is no record of a citizen having to shoot a neighbor in the knee caps to keep him from applying chemicals to their property. I would think if all you had to do was apply chemicals to a neighboring property until they have no option of excaping the chemcials except by fleeing, it would be happening everyday. It is not happening everyday, it does not happen everyday and the reason is because it is against the State and Federal law to do anything to the property of another person. They cannot do it and if they do they are subject to arrest by law enforcement. They do not get to continue the terrorist crimes against humanity until the people who are being poisoned flee. It does not happen and It is not going to happen to me. So whoever had the duty to file a trespassing complaint against this neighbor, I want to know right now. Is it the City police chief? Is it the County Attorney? Because I am going to challenge them to a fist fight. How dare they treat me as an undeserving citizen. How dare they use attorney discrection when the acts agaisnt me were life threatening. Kevin Vanderschel I am coming to town and I am going to request that you review the factual evidence, not the hearsay that you have gotten from third parites. If you collude with these local imposters I am going to swing on you. You do not have the right to violate my rights and you do not have the right to allow anyone to get away with intentionally causing me physical harm. I do not care if you can show me where it is written that you do, I am telling you you can find someone else to violated because I am not going to allow you or anyone else to do it to me . You oath or you office, which is it going to me, I am pissed off. I spent the last two years with an FBI agent who is either ignorant to the natural rights given to the people or he simply is protecting those people who gave him false information and he used it as facts. He has lied to you, I can prove it and you are going to give me the opportunity to prove not one of these locals are credible. I think I could take you in a fist fight, I don’t care how big you are. I am bigger because I have not violated anyone, I have not lied to anyone and most of all I have not critially harmed anyone. Be expecting me as I intend to come to your city on business, perhaps we could have lunch, my treat. Have your evidence prepared because I have mine all ready to battle it out, I do not want you on my case. You are not committed enough to your job to represent my case. You have already as much as told me you are going to allow my property to be taken by force and leave me with only the calassed hands from building my home, business and happiness. You should be ashamed to call your self a public servant just as the rest of them are. Collusion comes to mind.
Published on Dec 2, 2018