warning to City of Montrose unlawful application of toxic chemicals
3-24-2007 EPA warning City of Montrose illegal applied chemicals that directly feed into the Mississippi River.
This is the warning the EPA sent to the City. It states the process that the City failed to do in order to lawfully spray chemicals. If these chemicals were not harmful to humans, why would these laws be needed? The City is required to have a certified applicator, which they did not. This was done soon after Mark Conlee (suspiciously) took his elected seat as a council member. There has never been any chemicals sprayed on my property by anyone until Mark Conlee took the unlawful liberty to trespass on my property with toxic chemicals. After the City received this warning Mark Conlee continued to apply chemicals to my property as part of his yard maintenance routine, he went back to his original plan of only applying it to my property along our common boundary line. An investigation would expose that it was not the Street Dept, director Craig Junkins who actually applied the chemicals in the point source of the drainage ditch that flows to the backwater slough and into the Mississippi River. The chemicals were to precisely applied. Clearly only where the City easement is on my property, not any on Mr. Conlee’s easement. Mr Junkins would not have been so meticulous, he would have applied it the entire length of the Cities easement. Mr Conlee was obsessed with finding me guilty of violating a City ordinance. This act was another attempt to cite me for nuisance weeds. He personally came home from work during his lunch hour, (he never comes home for lunch) he personally drove directly to the area in the City’s drainage ditch and took photographs of the weeds on my side of the gully as well as the weeds on the Cities side of the gully. The photos only proved to be evidence that illegal chemicals had been directly applied to the headwaters of Jack Creek, these chemicals killed all living plants on my property but washed downstream through the City culvert and across the properties of the 2 downstream neighbors. It killed all living plants and probably animals on their properties also. It was the neighbor whose property was the farthest downstream who called and reported the incident to the EPA. The letter is addressed to Mr. Junkins only because he was the head of the street dept. at this time. Mr. Conlee being a City council member has no authority to do anything on behalf of the City except attend council meetings and vote. The Cities insurance does not cover him to be acting as an employee of the street dept. By this time due to the prior year of Mr Conlee illegally applying toxic chemicals to my property I had developed a skin condition so severe that it was unbearable to wear cloths, I was wearing my bathrobe when the field investigator came to the location and took soil samples and a written statement from the 2 other neighbors whose property was effected and myself. · Updated 4 minutes ago
former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano sought to carve out a distinction.
“To our belief, (Stack) was a lone wolf,” she said. “He used a terrorist tactic, but an individual who uses a terrorist tactic doesn’t necessarily mean they are part of an organized group attempting an attack on the United States.”
Napolitano’s description mapped out, if tortuously, a clear difference. But it also reinvented the word. By her given logic, a single individual without material support from others could not — by definition — carry out a terror attack.
I hired Steve Swan to sue the City of Montrose in July 2005. This is not typical for a neighbor to have to do, the building authority has the duty to address residents concerns regarding nuisance drainage issues caused by new property redevelopment. He sent this letter to Conlee that afternoon. He lied by continuing to claim he filed a complaint against the City of Montrose. He stated that we would sue both parties, the City is where the money is at. Based on the fact that the building permits are illegal, the redevelopment of the legally non conforming property is illegal I knew full well who the liable party was. So what does his failure to represent my best interests fall in the justice system. An investigation would be required to find that evidence. The evidence supports the least of his immoral, unethical behavior is legal malpractice. This could be due to his physical disabilities, This man is morbidly obese. For him to actually get to the courthouse to file a complaint on behalf of a client has to be extremely difficult for him. He had to set on four chairs in the courtroom. I filed a complaint but of course the sided with Swan, We agreed to barter services for this case, after which he sent me a bill for $4000.00. I never was billed after I filed the complaint. Is it not the his responsibility to present evidence and question witnesses? He never did that either. I believe the evidence supports his actions are within that of a co-conspirator.
I am contacting you again as there has been no authority who has reviewed my evidence. I am forwarding a letter I sent yesterday to a party who is described as protecting the Constitutional Rights of all Americans. Please ignore the caps as I was angry and am just plain tired of begging those with the power to protect my Constitution RIghts guaranteed to all, to dismiss my pleas, begging for the opportunity for my voice to be heard, at the least an investigation.
I have a case in which started with defamation of my character when I complained about a well connected neighbor. He purchased to land adjoining mine from the Mayor. Began illegal redevelopment of the legally non conforming property, issued illegal building permits. Causing adverse effects to my property. When he discovered he could not get the illegal redevelopment recorded on the County plat map he decided to eliminate me and acquire my property. He began using toxic chemicals as weapons applying them to my property. This went on for 5 years. I could not get any equal protection of the law. The effects of the chemicals were brutal, acts of terrorism, after 5 years I knew full well I was dying from these chemicals. I had lived disabled from the chemicals on money borrow from friends. A County officer stopped to inform me that this neighbor had no intention of stopping, he had to have my property to get his redevelopment recorded. I had to make a choice, kill him dead and pray that my health be restored or sell my property and pay the debt I owed friends that amounted to over $10,000. I sold my home, business, and property for enough to repay my friends and cover my final expenses, see more of my story at, https://poisonedbymyneighborfromhell.com
THIS CASE IS COMPLEX AND UNPRECEDENTED, THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS UNPRECEDENTED, THE ONGOING USE OF BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AGAINST A NEIGHBOR WITH NO INTERVENTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IS UNPRECEDENTED, THE CITY CLERK COMMITTING FRAUD, FABRICATION ORDINANCES, KNOWINGLY MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS AND DEMANDING PAYMENT ON A PAST DUE ACCOUNT BE DIRECTLY FROM THE POCKET OF THE ACCOUNT HOLDER IS UNPRECEDENTED, IT IS CRIMINAL. THE DEFAMATION OF MY CHARACTER BY THE BROTHER OF THIS NEIGHBOR A LEE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER KNOWINGLY FABRICATING EVIDENCE AND MAKING THESE FALSE STATEMENTS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, IN VIOLATION OF ETHICAL RULES AND WITH NO JURISDICTION ,AND A CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THIS LEE COUNTY OFFICER ACTING A BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR THE CITY IS UNPRECEDENTED. THE ATTORNEY I HIRED TO SUE THE CITY TOOK MY MONEY AND NEVER FILED A COMPLAINT. HE REASSURED ME SEVERAL TIMES THAT HE HAD, HE STATED THAT MY WITNESS LIST WAS COMPELLING AND NEVER ASK A SINGLE QUESTION OF ANY OF THEM WHEN I WAS THE DEFENDANT IF A CIVIL CASE FILED AGAINST ME BY THIS NEIGHBOR WHO WAS HELD ABOVE THE LAW IN EVERY ACTION THAT WAS IN VIOLATION OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IS UNPRECEDENTED. THAT COURT DISMISSED HIS CASE EVEN THOUGH MY ATTORNEY SUPPRESSED ALL EVIDENCE THE PROVED MY CASE WITHOUT A DOUBT IS UNPRECEDENTED. THE NEIGHBOR IN VIOLATION OF THE COURT RULING IN THE CASE HE FILED AGAINST ME VIOLATED THAT ORDER BY ALTERING, DESTROYING THINGS ON MY PROPERTY, HE HAD THE CHIEF OF POLICE AS A WITNESS WHEN HE TOLD ME IN ADVANCE HE WAS GOING TO VIOLATE THE COURT ORDER IS UNPRECEDENTED. THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAVING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST VIOLATED MY FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW, RIGHT TO ENJOY MY OWN PROPERTY AND HARASSED MY BY FILING FRIVOLOUS COMPLAINTS AGAINST ME THAT WERE SO RIDICULOUS I NEVER EVEN GOT INTO THE COURT ROOM, HE TOOK HEARSAY FOR EVIDENCE WHEN THERE WAS HARD COPY EVIDENCE THAT COULD NOT BE DENIED, STATING TO ME THAT HE WOULD DECIDE WHO GETS PROSECUTED IN LEE COUNTY, WHEN HIS DUTY IS TO PROSECUTE ALL CRIMINAL OFFENSES IN LEE COUNTY IS UNPRECEDENTED. THE FACT THAT I HAVE NEVER HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT MY EVIDENCE PROVING CONSPIRACY DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, TERRORIST ACTS USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS WITH INTENT TO CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY TO ANY AUTHORITY IS UNPRECEDENTED. THESE ARE ALL VIOLATIONS OF MY FEDERAL UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, THE FBI IS THE AGENCY DELEGATED TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC CORRUPTION CASES. THEY ARE THE FEDERAL AGENCY DELEGATED TO INVESTIGATE CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS, THEY ARE THE AGENCY DELEGATED TO INVESTIGATE DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW CASES, THEY CANNOT INVESTIGATE A CASE IN WHICH I HAVE NOT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT THE EVIDENCE THAT PROVES WITHOUT A DOUBT IN THEIR OWN STATEMENTS THEY IMPLICATED THEMSELVES. THIS CASE MEETS THE STANDARDS OF A RICO CASE. I AM NOT GOING TO BE THE VICTIM OF A NARCISSISTIC PSYCHOPATH WHO DECIDED TO TAKE MY PROPERTY BECAUSE HE AND THOSE IN AUTHORITY TO OVERSEE VIOLATED THE WRITTEN LAW, THIS WAS A BRUTAL PHYSICAL ATTACK, ONLY THE FBI HAS THE AUTHORITY AND DUTY TO INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS.
XXXX I do not have the authority to investigate whether there is a money trail supporting bribes were paid, I can not imagine this many people committing serious criminal acts just because they can. The first police chief told me straight up he did not want to make this neighbor mad. Perhaps they all know what he is capable of and were afraid to cross him. They went over and above what any friend would do. He was intentionally killing me and not batting an eye about it. His only concern was acquiring my property. They may have all been scared to death of him, but I am not the sacrificial lamb. They have a duty to protect my rights from monster neighbors if need be. End of story. I am demanding the opportunity to submit the evidence I have to an FBI agent that specializes in criminal profiling and violations of Constitutional Rights. It was a month ago that one of the County board of supervisors actually sat down and reviewed some of the evidence I have. He recognized violation of my right to due process, He left here knowing full well my Constitutional Rights have been violated. Absolutely no doubt about it.I am the victim here. But my right to free speech has been violated each time I had the floor at council meetings in regard to the illegal property redevelopment, well before the terrorist unleashed his wrath on me, The BOS stated when he left we need to get this into court, well I do not have the power and authority to do that I hired an attorney and he threw me under the bus, he never even filed the complaint against the city that I hired him to file, all I needed was someone to present the evidence to the court because I am to shy to speak in public. Attorney’s are not so incompetent as this one was without it being intentional. Being I have lost the ability to see (vision) due to the chemicals I only knew what he told me. I got my vision restored in 2012. I am still finding things that are incorrect when reading through this enormous stack of hard copy evidence I have. So I need to get this into court, how do you advise I do that, I know the FBI has the authority. So if they just plain don’t give a damn that a domestic terrorist is amongst the community. Are they forcing my hand to hurt one of these individuals to have my voice heard? I just need to know, because I will do what needs to be done to defend my Constitutional Rights. I have the right to defend my right when it is the DUTY of the government, Until I have the opportunity to submit the evidence that I knew as well as was advised by Senator Grassley to do back in 2007 I regard this as an open case. I am willing to travel where ever I need to go to meet with an agent.