9-1-2005 Johnson to Swan letter, full of false statements

Boatner has the right to do anything she wants with her property. Except violate ordinances and State building law as Conlee has done.

In a nutshell, Mark Conlee is a habitual liar. He is obsessed in attempting to make me take down the privacy curtain. He is intent on acquiring my property. I know I was losing my life to these chemicals. At what point does the law determine his actions become intentional to cause me serious injury or death, after my death? Please advise.

Conlees have failed to prove the privacy screen is definitely offensive, seriously annoying or intolerable, accordingly, it does not constitute a nuisance.

Former Lee County Attorney Michael Short and Chief of Police Brent Shipman make a well formed militia, no way justice was going to be served.

The County Attorney has the duty to prosecute all criminal offenses in his County. Mike Short advised me he would decide who get prosecuted in Lee County. I get summoned to court because "Mark Conlee said I gave him the finger." I don't do chemicals and if I did, I believe it would be my decision what chemical I would be exposed to. Not Lee County or the City of Montrose officials.

Evidence based on hearsay, “Mark Conlee says”

Evidence based on hearsay, “Mark Conlee says” when my evidence was hard copy documents, photos and witnesses described as “experts in their own right” and compelling list of witnesses in its own right.

18 U.S. Code § 245 – Federally protected activities | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Source: 18 U.S. Code § 245 - Federally protected activities | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Source: 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

5-9-2005 Follow up letter to State Rep. Phil Wise stating outcome of meeting.

Because the city building official refused to address my concerns in regard to the city's nuisance drainage ordinance, I telephoned the State Rep. Philip Wise. Mr Wise called city hall on my behalf and asked that I be put on the council meeting agenda so I could directly question Mark Holland appointed building official. With the agenda being public it is my opinion Holland was absent from that meeting for the purpose of avoiding my questions. Phil Wise did not hesitate to use his political influence as a professional courtesy to his constituent. He retired soon after this began. I have contacted now State Representative Jerry Kearns to speak with him about this ongoing situation. He refuses to speak to me about this subject. He has shown no professional courtesy that Phil Wise did. I resent Jerry Kearns for his disregard of my attack. What reason does he have to pretend that this hasn't happened on his watch? Does he have a conflict of interest? If he does he should acknowledge that to be a fact, not ignore my questions or disregard the serious criminal offenses committed by the local authorities. He represents the people, he should report any unethical behavior of the local government to the proper authorities.