My case In a nutshell. My well connected neighbor purchased the legally non conforming lot adjoining mine. All construction was done with fraudulently issued building permits by the City of Montrose, Iowa. He did not have enough land to fit his illegal structures on. At that time, 2005 they (the locals) determined his remedy was to eliminate me from my private property. Someone determined that he would apply toxic chemicals to my side only of the common boundary we had both verbally agreed on. When I saw the swath of dead grass on my side of the 300′ common boundary I immediately verbally told this neighbor not to apply anything to my property or come on my property again. I followed up immediately by chasing down the newly hired rookie Police chief and advised him what I had told this neighbor and requested and incident report. It took 16 months to receive a report that indicated I had told this neighbor not to trespass on my property. The chemicals continued this entire 16 months I was waiting for an incident report. By this time my entire body was in full blown severe skin disorder.
All posts by song boat
Hearsay evidence is more credible than hard copy documents, photos and a list of witnesses DESCRIBED as experts in their own right.
Hearsay Evidence based on “Mark Conlee said”
Evidence based on hearsay, “Mark Conlee says” when my evidence was hard copy documents, photos and a compelling list of witnesses described as “experts in their own right”. My evidence has never been reviewed by any government authority.
APRIL 7, 2005, PAGE 204
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING PAGE 2
- Drainage ditch. Mark Conlee spoke with Council regarding runoff from his property into a neighbor’s yard. He says Craig Junkins dug a trench and all is well now.
Authors note. Standard procedure would be that the complainant would confirm whether an issue has been resolved. There was no excavation of a ditch in front of the Conlee property, the drainage problem was caused by the new structures built on fraudulent building permits issued by the City of Montrose, Ia. The new structures are non conforming in size for the lot size required by the State of Iowa building code. Also in violation of the State of Iowa building code is the change of the frontage of Conlee’s property. The existing frontage was 5the St. it has now been changed to be the city alley between 4th and 5th St.
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING
2. Councilman Junkins said he talked to Mark Conlee. “Mr. Conlee said” his attorney advised him there wasn’t a problem.
Jeff Junkins has an existing conflict of interest as he is a fellow employee of Mark and Linda Conlee. Junkins made this statement at a public meeting as if it were a fact, possibly giving the general public a false opinion of the law. The lawyer Conlee is speaking of is not a lawyer at all, he is misrepresenting his brother Bob Conlee, who was at the time a Lee County officer, to be a lawyer. Evidence proves Conlee did not seek legal advice until later in the year.
MONTROSE COUNCIL MEETING
3. “He (Mark Conlee) said” her fence blew over during a recent storm.
Mark Conlee is lying about my curtain blowing over, had that happened he would have had pictures for evidence.
4. “Conlee said” Mark Holland told him he could put a fence on his side of the line he shares with Melody Boatner.
By making this statement Conlee indicates Holland has responded to his complaints about me. In my complaints against Conlee Holland refused his appointed duty to address complaints from neighbors of new redevelopments.. Holland stated to a fellow council member that he had no intention of addressing my concerns about the nuisance drainage caused by the illegal redevelopment.
5. He (Conlee) says” he has put weed killer on his side of the fence.
Photo evidence proves this is a false statement made by Mark Conlee
6. “He (Conlee) says” Melody Boatner has put a black curtain on an insecure structure.
I did put a privacy curtain up, however it was not insecure. I was well within my rights to install a privacy curtain. Mr. Conlee made a habit of hollering across the yard at me telling me that he was over the setbacks and such. He would make sure my customers saw him. by walking to the center of his yard and giving them a staring look of disapproval. Had Conlee not violated the law and changed the frontage of his property to be the alley he may not have had the impression that my backyard was his backyard. What he seems to believe is his backyard now is actually his side yard. Conlee has no backyard to speak of as his entire property lot is filled with oversized structures that overfill his allotted space.
7. “Conlee says” Boatner has broken the law with her wording.
This is another false statement made in a public forum for the purpose of giving the community an unfavorable opinion of my character. I was well within my right to post “Do not spray weed poison on my property. The sign was on my property.
8. “Conlee says” the black plastic on the lawn is a nuisance.
There is no ordinance stating black plastic is a nuisance, the material was not black plastic it was commercial landscape fabric.
9. “The Conlee’s say” they have never had words with her (Boatner) and they have done nothing wrong.
He has had words with me such as hollering across the yard to inform me that he was over the setbacks. He along with the police chief acting as a witness advised me that he was going to violate the civil court ruling that cited my right to enjoy my property, by physically moving the landscape timbers I had placed on my side of the common boundary to divert the excessive storm water runoff that he intentionally and illegally diverted onto my (Boatner’s) property. They (the Conlee’s) have violated every law in the book regarding redeveloping a legally non conforming property. However it is the duty of the City of Montrose to oversee that the redevelopment is compliant to State law. The false statements he made to the public defaming my character were enough to give an unfavorable opinion of the general public, Due to the serious effects of the toxic chemicals he (Conlee) applied on my private property, I was unable to wear clothes. I was unable to function enough to publicly challenge him on his false statements. Not that I have the duty to hold him accountable to the law, that is the duty of law enforcement and the city.
10. “They (the Conlee’s said”) were attacked with the writing on the curtain and are emotionally upset.
This is not even debatable, I had every right to post “do not spray” and to install a privacy curtain, At the time there was no city fence ordinance. I was physically and emotionally destroyed by the intentional chemical assault committed against me by Mark Conlee and his conspirators of local government authorities. My right to equal protection and due process were violated by the criminal offenses committed by Conlee and the other officials who acted on his behalf. As a group they committed Conspiracy against Rights and Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law. Both of which are violations of Federal law.
A person with this kind of character and influence with the local government officials that is living anywhere near you, be aware that you are in constant danger of being legally abused.
Here is a man continually applying toxic chemicals on my private property for over five years. It was obvious with the naked eye to see that my health had been severely affected by these chemicals to which he has no regard or empathy. He had to have my (Boatner’s) property to ever get his illegal non conforming redevelopment recorded on the County plat map. He, assisted by an entire entity of government, was willing to do whatever it took to eliminate me.
Yet he has the grandiosity to state that he was attacked by me posting “Do not spray” on my property line where chemicals had been sprayed since May 2005.
I had the right to take up arms and defend my person and my property. I felt that was extreme due to the fact that laws for trespassing are commonly filed and by law enforcement and violators commonly prosecuted by County attorney’s to protect private property rights.
I did not realize the influence this neighbor/council member had. I did not know that law enforcement would hold him higher above the law than he held himself.
I made the wrong decision in believing that my rights were as guaranteed as Mr Conlee’s and every other citizen of the USA.
The City officials who were, in this case, more than willing to conspire with Mr. Conlee’s needs to violate my State and Federal Constitutional Rights have no history of violating the State and Federal rights of any other residents of the City of Montrose, Iowa.
Using a conflict of interest for self serving financial profit is a violation of Ethical rules for government service.
Fraudulent building permits, fraudulent ordinances and fabricated laws were all used by these conspirators. These are criminal offenses.
This case is far from being over. Justice will be served either the easy way or the hard way. That is a promise I made to my dear departed father and myself. In my opinion a jury of my peers would find that justice served is justice deserved.
The liability in this case lies with the City of Montrose, County of Lee, Ia in their official and individual capacities. Mr. Conlee did not do anything that he was not allowed to do by local law enforcement.
Share this: WordPress
Federally protected liberties –
Civil liberties are more broad-based rights and freedoms that are guaranteed at the federal level by the Constitution and other federal law such as fundamental rights including the right to vote, free speech, or the right to privacy.
What Are Civil Rights? – FindLaw
Share this: WordPress
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 11B—CHEMICAL WEAPONS § 229.Prohibited activities
Here is the Federal law.
(a)Unlawful Conduct.—Except as provided in subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly—
(1)to develop, produce, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, stockpile, retain, own, possess, or use, or threaten to use, any chemical weapon; or
(2)to assist or induce, in any way, any person to violate paragraph (1), or to attempt or conspire to violate paragraph (1).
(b)Exempted Agencies and Persons.—
(1)In general.—Subsection (a) does not apply to the retention, ownership, possession, transfer, or receipt of a chemical weapon by a department, agency, or other entity of the United States, or by a person described in paragraph (2), pending destruction of the weapon.
(2)Exempted persons.—A person referred to in paragraph (1) is—
(A)any person, including a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, who is authorized by law or by an appropriate officer of the United States to retain, own, possess, transfer, or receive the chemical weapon; or
(c)Jurisdiction.—Conduct prohibited by subsection (a) is within the jurisdiction of the United States if the prohibited conduct—
(1)takes place in the United States;
(2)takes place outside of the United States and is committed by a national of the United States;
(3)is committed against a national of the United States while the national is outside the United States; or
(4)is committed against any property that is owned, leased, or used by the United States or by any department or agency of the United States, whether the property is within or outside the United States.
Here is what happened to a resident of the City of Montrose, Lee County, Ia.
Tell me what about the Federal law is not valid for what happened to a resident in the City of Montrose, Lee County, Iowa. Dirty, Rotten, Bastards.
Share this: WordPress
About US Senator Chuck Grassley
Notice the date I first contacted him. He failed to come through with his promises that he could have the Feds investigated.
Share this: WordPress
Office of Professional Responsibility reply to my complaint.
I do not understand my government. My complaint is about Dept. Of Justice authorities. Specifically about Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa Kevin VanderSchel.
- He lied to me when he told me that he has the authority to violate a civil court order with no type of court process.
- He advised me that no matter what the evidence proved he would use attorney discretion and not prosecute corrupt State and local officials.
- The corrupt State and local officials have no authority to violate my State and Federal Constitutional rights anymore that VanderSchel has.
- VanderSchel was getting his evidence from my WordPress site as if what was written there is factual and in real time.
- I can state that it is factual but certainly not all the relevant evidence is included on that website.
How can they not give me information to contact the signatory of this letter and advise me not to contact this office anymore. This office is paid for by taxpayers. Its not their office to dominate. They work for the people.
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room 3266 Washington, DC 20530
Sent via e-mail
Melody K. Boatner
songboat@gmail.com
Dear Ms. Boatner:
This is in response to your correspondence to the Office of the Inspector General, which was forwarded to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for review and response. In your correspondence, you complained about an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa and a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent.
OPR has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of misconduct involving Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys that relate to the exercise of their authority to investigate, litigate or provide legal advice, as well as allegations of misconduct by law enforcement personnel when they are related to allegations of attorney misconduct within the jurisdiction of OPR. It is, however, the policy of this Office to refrain from investigating issues or allegations that could have been or still may be addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a DOJ attorney or law enforcement agent. Based on our review of your correspondence, we have determined that your allegations fall into this category. Accordingly, we concluded that no action by this Office is warranted. You may wish to consult private counsel or contact the nearest Legal Aid Society to determine what additional legal avenues, if any, may be available to you.
We regret that we are unable to be of further assistance to you in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jacqueline Robertson
Program Analyst
May 6, 2020
Share this: WordPress
The 28th Amendment
I do not remember where I got this from and I haven’t fact checked it.
Please read 28th amendment Please Read, and forward. This will only take 1 minute to read! 28th Amendment, 35 States and Counting. It will take you less than a minute to read this. If you agree, please pass it on. It’s an idea whose time has come to deal with this self-serving situation: OUR PRESENT SITUATION ! Children of Congress members do not have to pay back their college student loans. Staffers of Congress family members are also exempt from having to pay back student loans. Members of Congress can retire at full pay after only one term. Members of Congress have exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed, under which ordinary citizens must live. For example, they are exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment. And as the latest example, they have exempted themselves from Healthcare Reform, in all of its aspects. We must not tolerate an elite class of such people, elected as public servants and then putting themselves above the law. I truly don’t care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent, or whatever. The self-serving must stop. Governors of 35 states have filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon their states.It only takes 38 (of the 50) States to convene a Constitutional Convention. IF??? Each person that receives this will forward it on to 20 people, in three days most people in The United States of America will have the message. Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: “Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the Citizens of the United States …” You are one of my 20. 6:26 PM President Trump is asking everyone to forward this email to a minimum of 20 people, and to ask each of those to do likewise. In three days, most people in the United States will have the message. This is an idea that should be passed around, regardless of political party. The TRUMP Rules: Congressional Reform Act of 2017 1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they’re out of office. And, no more perks go with them. 2. Congress (past, present, & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose. 3. Congress must purchase their own retirement plan, just as ALL Americans do. 4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%. 5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people. 6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people (i.e. NO MORE INSIDER TRADING!!!). 7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congress made all these contracts by and for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor and privilege NOT a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators should serve their term(s), then go home and go back to work … not get all kinds of freebies.
Share this: WordPress
City of Montrose, Iowa Cops respond to Conlee complaint that I have picture of him posted on a tree on my private property.
Its not illegal to have a sheet of paper hanging on my tree. I could not enjoy my property for over 5 years. I paid taxes on it. He was a stalker. He was consumed by trying to get me convicted of a crime. He is the one who terrorized me.
I found this photo online and hung it on a tree in my yard. The next thing I know the Police Chief Brent Shipman is knocking on my door. He explained that Mark Conlee had called in a complaint that I had a picture of him hanging on a tree. Lol Great use of City resources.
Share this: WordPress
Armor
Share this: WordPress
Sometimes
Share this: WordPress
PTSD
Share this: WordPress
Civil Complaint
Share this: WordPress
Random Facts about the attack
. You may have been manipulated into believing that I was involved with illegal drug activity by the opposing party of government officials. I witnessed Lee County Sheriff’s officer Bob Conlee make a false statement associating me with a known pot grower. The evidence supports that an incident of mistaken identity may have caused an embarrassing moment for officer Conlee involving me in the past. He took that information out of context. He makeup his own compilation of events stating his version to the public on the police radio. It was a fluke that I witnessed him make the false statement about me that evening. The timing of this false statement made about me by Officer Conlee was at the same time the attack against my person and my property began.
I want to make a PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT at this time. Any of you who are not aware that all Law enforcement officers lie, are in a delusional state of denial. It’s that simple. The days that an officer finds honor in honesty have been long gone. It is a job requirement to lie in order to protect the thin blue line.
You may have been manipulated into believing that I am “crazy” by the opposing party of government officials. I have hard copy evidence that supports my sound mind. I did have an extended period of my life that I was tortured physically and mentally by my government using chemicals as a weapon in a brutal assault against me. During this time the Ft. Madison ER was giving me massive amounts of IV steroid injections. The purpose was to offer me some relief from the excruciating pain of my skin being raw from the chemical exposure. The evidence proves that I was evaluated and it was determined my hallucinations were caused by IV steroid overdose. I was in the ICU for three days. I can testify that it was a trip.
You may have been manipulated into believing that I am a “lazy” person who never takes care of my financial responsibilities or maintaining my home and property by the opposing party of government officials. That is simply not true. I downloaded a copy of my credit score when it was obvious I was not going to be able to make payments on unexpected back to back ER visits.My credit score was 760. These ER visits were an attempt to get some relief from the severe skin condition caused by the intentional application of chemicals to my private property. The chemical exposure rendered with no ability to function. I survived by the generosity of friends. The IV steroid injections caused me significantly more physical disabilities, they cause me to be blind. When I fled from my private property it was the only option I had to attempt to save my life. Being blind and homeless for the following 4 years should not have happened. This terrorist physically assaulted me for over 5 years. My conditions exacerbated within 3 weeks. It was unbearable to simply wear clothes. The local were aware of this and still chose to allow me to be tortured by the actions of this narcissist neighbor. The conflict of interested was taken and used as a way to represent this person and hold him above the law in every fraudulent, immoral terrorist act he committed against me.
The “rash” that erupted on my shins caused severe intense itching immediately after my skin was exposed to it.. It was not until after the grass had died several days later that I could visually see that chemicals had been unlawfully applied to my property. The chemicals were applied to my side of the 300’ common boundary I shared with a neighbor. It was obvious the chemicals had been applied to my property by my neighbor. Nobody else had access to the property. Nobody else had a reason to eliminate me from my private property.
Regarding the defamation of my character as being “lazy” and not maintaining my yard to the degree deserving of nuisance abatement notices. Evidence supports my neighbor,
Mark Conlee stated “even though Mel Boatner has an older home, she maintains it well”, and that was one of the considerations used in determining we (the Conlee’s) would purchase the from Mayor Dinwiddie.
I was constantly harassed by the City on the Conlee’s behalf. Multiple criminal complaints were filed against me by the State and the City. The charges were with intent to cause financial hardship. The criminal charges based on fabricated laws and ordinances were all dismissed against me.
I was denied filing a criminal complaint for multiple counts of fraud against the City and city clerk Celeste Cirinna prosecuted by Lee County Attorney Mike Short. Cirinna admitted to altering a city ordinance with Mayor Scumbailto present.
The exposure to the chemicals caused serious severe effects to my health and caused complete depletion of my financial resources. I was completely unable to function. I could not work in my upholstery shop. I was suffering so severely that my skin would erupt and bleed uncontrollably. In the upholstery business that is not acceptable. It was unbearable to simply wear clothes. I was being tortured by the assault with chemical weapons.
I have no experience in a court of law. I have never needed an attorney to argue a case on my behalf. I was referred to Steve Swan ESQ. Steve Swan advised that he would represent me in filing a complaint against the City of Montrose. Swan advised me that my case is a tort case. He advised me that the person who referred me to him had briefed him on the case. He was advised that I was not financially prepared to find myself defending my Constitutional Rights in a lawsuit. He advised that he was willing to barter his service for mine. He did requested $100 for the filing fee which I paid him that day. I questioned him about his knowledge of the law applying to my case and he was knowledgeable in property law, he agreed that the city is the liable party. Swan advised me that he had already spoken with my neighbor’s brother about this case. He advised that the neighbor’s brother had lied to him about the situation. The neighbor’s brother at the time was an officer for the Lee County Sheriff’s dept Bob Conlee. Swan advised we would file a complaint against both the City and my neighbor.
The following day I received a copy of a letter of intent Swan sent to my neighbor. In the letter he advised that he had 10 days to remedy the nuisance drainage issue. If there was no remedy in ten days, he would file an injunction.
In this case my attorney suppress all the indisputable evidence I had gathered to present to the judge.Steve Swan never filed the complaint he was hired to file against the liable party, the City of Montrose. Steve Swan intentionally misled me into believing he had filed a complaint against the City of Montrose as he was hired to do. It was not until the final day of this civil trial in which I am the defendant that Swan snickered and advised me that he did not want the case against the City.
You can imagine my confusion when 6 months later I am served a summons by my neighbor. Conlee is suing me for “loss of enjoyment of his property”.
He continued to apply the chemicals to my private property, as if it were his own. I installed a privacy curtain. I am well within my legal rights. I had a reality check at this time. I realized after the fact that my attorney most likely took my case on behalf of the Conlee’s. He never submitted the affidavit of my witnesses. He never questioned my witnesses when they took the stand. These are the same witnesses that he described as “experts in their own right” at our first meeting.He never objected to what the Conlee’s were stating in the multiple times they committed perjury in the courtroom.
Had this judge had been given the evidence supporting my allegations he could have recognized that two or more government officials with the intent to cause me harm deprived me of my private property rights under color of law. From 2005-2010 the chemicals were routinely applied to my property on a weekly basis.
I felt a sense of relief when in the finding of facts of this case. The Judge cited my “right to use my property as I wished”. I falsely believed the chemical attack would cease with my rights being cited in this ruling.
I was completely mistaken. This neighbor never complied to any law, code or regulation since he began the property redevelopment. He had no regard for this court order. Law enforcement never enforced compliance to this court order just as they had never held him accountable for any of the other multiple violations of the law he committed.
With every dismissal of any criminal charges brought against me, this neighbor became more aggressive in his attack to eliminate me from my private property. He was obsessed with making the court find me in violation of a law.
Prior to being exposed to these chemicals I was in good health. My credit score was 760. I was always aware, as a self employed business owner, maintaining my health was a high priority. I did practice preventive maintenance.
As any other reasonable US citizen, I never expected a neighbor or my government to wage a full on attack against me using chemical weapons. I expected as a US citizen to be safe and secure in my home and on my private property. I expected to always have the right to enjoy my private property. Federal law protects these rights guaranteed to all citizens. The hard copy evidence supports a premeditated intent to violate my Federally protected rights.
I was aware that at some point the government would put a stop on this neighbor’s non compliant property redevelopment. Had standard procedures been followed by the City building administrator this project would have never gotten started. This neighbor had blueprints of his redevelopment. The building administrator is required to review the blueprints. This project would have been denied without question had the building administrator represented the State as he did in every other building permit he issued.
Site layout and stormwater drainage are the first steps in property development. This information is available in every handyman’s book or manual. If common sense does not guide a builder into knowing that you cannot divert more storm water onto a neighboring property than before the redevelopment, any Do-it-yourself 101 states the law does not allow to new redevelopment to divert more storm water onto a neighboring property than before. A new property redevelopment cannot devalue a neighboring property. In this case my property lost a value of $10,000 before the project was even completed.
Legally non conforming properties are restricted to not being allowed to have new structures larger than the existing structures. This should have been the end of this story. The worst that could legally have happened would have been this neighbor made an investment into a property that is not developable. Based on the size of the structures this neighbor built on his narrow strip of land. His desire was to have a small farm in the middle of the towns residential district.
In this case the building administrator was aware that this was a legally non conforming property. For reasons I do not know, this building administrator intentionally violated his duty to represent the State of Iowa building code and drainage laws.
- He approved these non conforming structures.
- He approved the site layout and drainage.
- He approved but failed to document the fill dirt that was trucked in, elevating this property as much as 12 ft in some areas.
- He allowed the illegal removal of an existing berm.
- He issued fraudulent building permits specifically for this particular person.
Witnesses will testify that when they had a building permit issued this appointed building administrator followed the standard procedures by the book. One instance the witness states that this building administrator questioned the position she had her buildings laid out on her blueprints. Another says that when he was issued a building permit for a new shed he was charged a fee. The building administrator for the Conlee redevelopment knowingly issued five fraudulent building permits. The permit for the new home there was no fee was charged. The Mayor certainly knew that the property was legally non conforming, he sold the property to Conlee. It has been suggested by multiple neighbors that the building administrator and the Mayor were involved in an arson of the existing double wide mobile home.
The Mayor’s role in this is relevant concerning a conflict of interest.. The Mayor had a personal financial gain. Ethically he had a duty to step out of any issues concerning this property. He without the authority acted as the building administrator on one occasion in this case.
The Mayor has a questionable history regarding properties he has owned. Several years prior to this personal financial gain from the sale of real property an individual addressed the city council about her plan to rent a building and open a tattoo shop. The city council denied her plan, explaining that they did not think a tattoo shop would portray the city in the way they wanted the City to be presented.
Not long after that, a different person addressed the City council. This individual was requesting to open a tattoo shop. This person’s intent was to purchase a property from the Mayor and operate the business from that location. The City council gave this person their full support. The Mayor sold his property, he had a personal financial gain and everyone was happy. Some of the city council members were so supportive they put tattoos on their bodies. The complete change of attitude about a tattoo shop opening in the city I suspect may be a self serving purpose having nothing to do with what the council wants the city to be represented as.
Conlee’s motive was to acquire my property at any cost. I knew his motive when he refused my verbal request to stop applying the chemicals to my property. Without my property he could never get his illegal redevelopment recorded on the County plat map. His oversized non conforming structures would never legally fit on his narrow lot of property, no matter which way he positioned his structures. According to Iowa law and according to a statement made by the Mayor on public record, legally non conforming properties cannot be redeveloped with structures having a larger footprint than the existing structures.
I followed all the standard procedures to remedy the situation. A conspiracy against my Federally protected rights, deprivation of rights under color of law allowed for my private property to be taken by force. An act of contempt of a civil court judge citing my right to use my property as I wished, allowed for me to be tortured. He would not stop the chemical attack until he achieved his goal. Government officials and law enforcement had no intention of stopping him. Refusing to trespass him from my property equals a conspiracy. This neighbor was held above the law in every criminal action that was committed against me.
Ongoing refusal to review my evidence is not the remedy for this situation. There is no statute of limitations for torture. FBI agent Thomas Reinwart and Assistant US Attorney Kevin VanderSchel’s willfull misconduct and intentional negligence has caused significantly more mental torture. Reinwart admits he used hearsay evidence to predetermine his decision, with no concern of being held accountable for violating my Federally protected rights. VanderSchel knowingly made a false statement advising that he had the authority to violate a civil court order. Neither of them have authority to violate any citizens Federally protected rights. They are not representing the Federal laws. They are representing corrupt State and local public officials under color of law.
Share this: WordPress
Requesting answer to question regarding US attorney’s authority.
I have made some connections with associates of the US Attorney’s office. I deserve honest answers to my questions. An expert of Federal law should have the integrity to answer my questions honestly.
- Does an AUSA have the authority to violate a civil court order with no type of court process. This particular AUSA advised me that he does have that right. In is not reasonable that any attorney can violate any court order without some type of court process. If I am incorrect show me the written law.
- Does an AUSA have the right to violate a citizens Constitutional and Civil rights by using attorney discretion and not prosecuting Corrupt State and Local officials? #law #justice #torture #corruption
This AUSA should not have had to go to my website to get his evidence. My website is not updated in real time. I have thousands of documents of evidence supporting my allegations. I have never claimed they were posted on my website. The FBI agent had the duty to investigate my evidence. He refused, advising me to “tell him the story”. He then sent me an email stating that he had made his decision that no Federal law has been violated based on what Lee County Sheriff Stacy Weber told a third party. I am not an attorney but I know that hearsay is not evidence. I also know its a Federal crime to lie to the FBI. Not in this case and I want to know why I have been held exempt from any law protecting my person and my property from chemical warfare.
In this letter he completely abuses his power of office by denying me the right to submit further evidence to him by advising me not to communicate with his office. A recent letter in the local newspaper supports a conflict of interest between this AUSA and Sheriff Weber as they have spent “years” working on a drug case. Yet another conflict of interest that would not have been discovered had the article not been published in the newspaper.
This AUSA seems to believe he has the option not to prosecute a case with such a serious offense as torture. I don’t believe he does have that option. I believe he has the duty to recuse himself from this case and have this case prosecuted by a US Attorney from Illinois or Missouri. The thin blue line stops when a citizens live is on the line. Had I not have fled I would be dead.
The evidence proves Mark Conlee did this intentionally to harm me. That is what the FBI was supposed to be investigating, EVIDENCE not HEARSAY. There are no assumptions or conjecture on my part at all.
Share this: WordPress
Montrose and Lee County, Iowa unprecedented case of chemical weapons used to eliminate a civilian in Iowa, USA.
Due to personal issues I will not be available for updating my story on a regular basis. Please share. I believe if the one person gets this story the public would make mincemeat out of these Public impostors.
Share this: WordPress
Proposal to end the madness. Request for a few good citizens to assist in ending the madness!
https://wedeclare.wordpress.com/2019/08/02/a-modest-proposal-to-end-the-madness/
Share this: WordPress
12-26-2019 submitting complaint to FBI Agent Thomas Reinwart one last time.
|
Share this: WordPress
The Pathocracy of the Deep State: Tyranny at the Hands of a Psychopathic Government — John W. Whitehead, Constitutional Attorney
“Politicians are more likely than people in the general population to be sociopaths. I think you would find no expert in the field of sociopathy/psychopathy/antisocial personality disorder who would dispute this… That a small minority of human beings literally have no conscience was and is a bitter pill for our society to swallow — but […]
Share this: WordPress
I am hoping that someone with authority gets word of my situation.
I am not or have never been an aggressive person. Well maybe a little 25 years ago when I had a nip or two. But I am the type if I don’t agree with someone I keep it to myself. I am not confrontational. I will take the short end of the stick every time to keep the peace. This case is more than I can handle. I promised myself I will not be the only victim of this brutal attack. I will invoke my 2nd amendment right. I don’t know when. I just know that I cannot allow for my dad to have served on a Destroyer in the South Pacific taking on bombs and kamikaze pilots thinking he was fighting for the freedoms of his countrymen.
Ironically he spent his career working as the Street Commissioner of a larger neighboring town. His father’s career was also working for the neighboring city. I know the duties and responsibilities a city MUST provide its residents. One of them being nobody has the right to do anything to another persons property. Trespass enforce would have solved this problem from the get go. This was a conspiracy against my rights. Deprivation of Rights under color of law and torture from chemical warfare.
