POISONED BY MY NEIGHBOR FROM HELL THE EFFECTS INTENTIONAL EXPOSURE TO TOXIC CHEMICALS HAVING DIRECT CONTACT WITH MY SKIN
Evidence that was withheld or suppressed by City officials and Lee County attorney that proves ethical and criminal offenses have been committed against me.Evidence that was withheld or suppressed by City officials and Lee County attorney that proves ethical and criminal offenses have been committed against me. Evidence that was withheld or suppressed by City officials and Lee County attorney that proves ethical and criminal offenses have been committed against me.
Suppressed and previously withheld from the civil case Conlee vs Boatner EQEQ
Within the past few weeks the people of Lee County, Ia have gotten a new Sheriff and a new County Attorney. I thought I would contact both of them and see if they were interested in pursuing criminal actions against the local officials who have without a doubt committed crimes against me.
First I telephoned the new County Attorney, he advised me that he would take action against criminals, he did require a complaint be given to him by the sheriff though. I am curious why former Lee County, Ia Attorney Michael Short never requested this. Short told me straight up he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County. He did decide, he refused to file a complaint against criminals with evidence that was unquestionable. He did file complaints against innocent people being charged with fabricated laws. He was unsuccessful at getting convictions for these imaginary violations of fabricated laws.
Anyway, my thoughts that the new sheriff would ever implicate the former Law Enforcement officer that he stated in his first press release after being elected were pretty clear to me not going to happen. I talked to him and he told me he would help me attain justice. But I just never considered that he would be true to his word. The fact that in the press release he praises the former Lee County Detective that was so heavily involved in the illegal actions against me as being the major factor as to why he chose law enforcement as a career is telling in itself. The thin blue line does not get crossed, even though they claim they will unhold the law. Not reasonable in my mind. The fact that he made this former detective’s son his right hand man, also makes me question his loyalty. Is he willing to put his mentor on the chopping block as his duty to protect and serve the people. I doubt that.
The discussions we did have were in reference to him giving me the name of a Federal agent. That I admit he did stay true to his word and do. He also advised me that he informed the city of Montrose clerk that there was an investigation into public corruption. I asked “what did she say?”. He told me she said she didn’t know what he was talking about.
Within days the City of Montrose website was taken down, the clerk was the administrator. She had been vigilant at keeping the public record of the city council meeting minutes up to date, beginning in Jan. 2005. I had noticed that three different months had been removed, those minutes being the ones that contained the record of the Mayor and council implicating themselves by statements they made at the meetings. I had the copies of those meeting minutes any how.
I believe the fact that the city clerk took down the website only after being advised there was an investigation is just the latest action that supports the evidence that a conspiracy against my rights has occurred, I think this extends statute of limitations is the only positive result from this action in her attempt to cover up the evidence, no worries though I have every month of city council meeting minutes downloaded and saved. So I may owe the new Sheriff a thank you for his assistance.
I do not feel comfortable meeting with the new sheriff. I have little trust in the local authorities when it comes to upholding the law. I have also heard rumor that the new right hand man is a little aggressive and I do not want any interaction with him. He is going to defend his family to the best of his power. That is an honorable character trait, if it weren’t for the fact that his family members committed unprecedented criminal offenses.
poisoned by my neighbor from hell
The facts of this case in a brief summary is that a neighbor purchased the legally nonconforming lot adjoining mine. He began redeveloping it the following year by trucking in enough fill dirt to elevate the lot up to 10′ higher, constructed a two story nonconforming garage with roof surface altered to allow stormwater runoff to be diverted directly onto my property. He regraded the fill dirt from the alley down to my property, resulting in diverting all stormwater runoff from his new redevelopment. The building permit issued for this structure is illegal. He also did not install drain tile around the slab or along the common boundary to carry stormwater to the city drainage ditch. I was advised he intended to build a living quarter in the upper level of this garage when I mentioned my concern about adverse affects to my property.
The following year after a suspicious fire destroyed the existing double wide mobile home, he changed the plan. He was issued an illegal building permit for a new home. He again built a nonconforming structure, altered the roof surface and trucked in fill dirt all of which were made to intentionally divert stormwater from the entire lot onto my property. He illegally removed and existing berm, conflicting with a statement made under oath. He changed the frontage of the new home to be the alley. This to conflicts with a statement he made under oath. He and the city raised the alley to act as if it were his private city street, higher that the private property abutting it. The raising of the alley is in conflict with the standard procedure of an alley to be lower that the property adjoining it to take stormwater from a backyard and carry it to the city drainage ditch. There are many inconsistencies and conflicting statements implicating himself in perjury in the civil case he filed against me for loss of enjoyment of his property. The case was dismissed. At no time did the building official address my concerns, he did continue to issue illegal building permits to this neighbor however.
He then used his connections to be elected to city council. Specifically the city clerk. In that position he attempted to cause me financial harm, however all cases against me were dismissed, only costing the taxpayers of the city money. One case was for the same complaint the same as the civil case he filed against me, it was dismissed with a note at the bottom from the judge questioning the purpose of the case against me by the city. He held his position as city council member for the intent of continuing to harass me. He made false police reports against me. He initiated nuisance weed ordinances with the intent to cause me physical harm. He began applying toxic chemicals to my property in early 2005. I followed all standard procedures provided for me to remedy the nuisance drainage issue his property redevelopment causing adverse effects and loss of value to my property. The city building official refused to follow standard procedure to remedy the situation. The chemicals had severe effects to my physical health. I suffered severe pain as a result of not being able to get equal protection of the law in my requests for them to issue a trespassing complaint on my behalf. I had no protection of the law and the city level or the county level, in fact certain law enforcement officers misrepresented their authority and jurisdiction to act on this neighbors behalf. Ethical violation of not recognizing a conflict of interest existed at every local level, those special relationships were used for the benefit on this neighbor. He violated the civil court ruling by physically altering the railroad ties I had placed on my property to divert stormwater toward the city drainage ditch, he was assisted by Chief of Police Brent Shipman.
The chemicals unlawfully applied to my property continued for the following five years. My right to enjoy my own property as cited in the civil court ruling was violated due to the illegal application of the chemicals. These chemicals caused my condition to deteriorate to the degree that I believe they were going to be the cause of my death. He would not stop. No law enforcement officer intended to make him stop the criminal act. The Lee County Attorney advised me that “he would decide who gets prosecuted in Lee County.” He proceeded to file criminal complaints against me on my neighbors behalf. All were dismissed due to the fabrication of a law itself.
This neighbor had all the right people in all the right positions that he was aided and abetted causing me serious injury. When he discovered he could not get his illegal property redevelopment recorded on the county plat map is when he began using the chemicals as a weapon against me. He motive was to acquire my property. He could never get his illegal property redevelopment recorded on the county plat map without the addition of my property to his lot. I was forced to flee to escape the chemicals that were killing me. I fled from my home, business, property and the chemicals cost me my health. There are no words to express being violated of my right to this degree. I did survive only due to one Dr. from the University of Iowa hospital. However the medication I must take to control the severe skin condition will more likely than not cause damage to my internal organs. The damages include pain and suffering, along with the severe skin condition I lost my eyesight for over 7 years. I was unable to read, recognize people and had no business driving. My successful upholstery service that I operated out of my shop on my property and future income from that business. All lost income that will affect the amount of SS I received had I been allowed to stay at my property till retirement as I had planned for myself. This is unprecedented in that there is no other case according to the EPA field investigator in which a neighbor has been allowed to used chemicals on a neighbor’s property. There are laws in place to prevent this type of thing from happening.
After being told by Mayor Dinwiddie that this was a private issue I went to City Hall. I got copies of the building permits on file for Mark Conlees new garage and his new home. This one for his ne…
Did you know that occupying on private land protected by Property rights is considered a trespass? The law will find you guilty and can send you away for a couple of months or pay some hefty fee you should know about.
What Constitutes a Trespass?
If you physically cross the boundary into someone else’s property, that’s a trespass. Property intrusion will either be on the land itself, above the surface or below the surface as well. So if you dig your way past someone’s property boundary or fly a plan or drone above the ground, you have already trespassed.
Intentional or Unintentional?
Intentional trespassing is when a person willingly crosses the boundary to someone’s property. It doesn’t matter whether the individual didn’t have the intention or clue they are trespassing; such an act warrants the property owner to seek action against the intruder. On the other hand, there is unintentional trespassing, which is when the intruder accidentally enters the property when it wasn’t their intention to. Such an act will be considered malicious only if it causes any harm to the property owner or anything confined within the said property.
Entering without Permission
The property owner may license an individual to enter the land when they please. However, the land owner has the right to revoke that license/permission after which it will be considered a trespass if the individual continues to occupy the land. Where the land owner does not withdraw the license, a trespass will be recorded when the individual stays in the land after expiry of their license. If the individual exceeds the agreement stated on the license, it is considered a trespass as well.
Entering without Privilege
This is a law that grants an individual, say the police, right to enter the property without the owner’s consent. This is usually to curb a nuisance or perceived harm within the property to retrieve someone else’s property on the land or to perform any duty mandated by the law.
This is generally the scope that entails Property Rights and Trespassing. Follow us at The Judge’s Chamber: Law Blog for more tips on legal rights.